PROOF_OBLIGATION
Consequential execution does not prove its required ending.
SITE 68 - CONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCE KERNEL
Site 68 is the disclosed semantic freeze candidate before proof-assistant mechanization. It closes object identity, rights geometry, obligation continuity, irreversibility, truth-class and revocation-exposure gaps without claiming legal judgment or external validation.
Reference admission
A synthetic robot movement is admitted only because object identity, MOVE + OPERATE rights, obligation lineage, proof-gated irreversibility and an empirical predicate all pass simultaneously.
Fifteen constitutional laws
The intended next step is formal proof of this small semantic core, not another expansion cycle.
Consequential execution does not prove its required ending.
Every consequence right traces to an accepted governing authority.
Identifiers do not silently collapse into the same real object.
Delegation cannot broaden authority.
Delegation cannot multiply aggregate consequence authority.
Delegation cannot silently erase unresolved obligations.
Effects requiring multiple rights need their compatible intersection; prohibition dominates.
Irreversible consequence cannot exceed the currently justified budget.
Higher consequence tranches may depend on prior proof checkpoints.
Empirical, normative and adjudicative truth are not interchangeable.
FINAL requires authoritative support for governing predicates.
Material unresolved uncertainty cannot be converted into success.
A governing contradiction prevents FINAL.
Later governing contradiction invalidates downstream reliance.
Compensation and supersession append history and never rewrite it.