Capability
May this exact configured executor perform this exact effect?
EFFECT LEDGER
The Effect Ledger records PREPARED/CONSUMED executor receipts and detects double consumption of the same consequence capability. Completion still requires authoritative post-effect evidence through the ordinary Finality process.
Recursion boundary
The capability authorizes one downstream effect. The effect itself becomes observable reality and, where consequential, must be reconciled against authoritative post-effect evidence rather than recursively trusting its own authorization.
May this exact configured executor perform this exact effect?
What did the executor claim it did?
What does governing reality say actually happened?
Is the post-effect obligation supportably closed?