01 · FINALITY
Finality Kernel — Did the consequential obligation reach and retain its governing authoritative ending?
Explore →SEVEN-PILLAR REALITY FABRIC
Who may act? Under what policy? Using which data? Against which asset reality? Under what agreement? Inside what risk envelope? And did the intended ending actually become true?
The seven questions
A system that answers only one or two of these questions can still make a consequentially wrong decision.
Finality Kernel — Did the consequential obligation reach and retain its governing authoritative ending?
Explore →MandateZero — Who may cause what, for whom, why, when, under which mandate, and for how long?
Explore →PolicyZero — What governing rules permit, prohibit, obligate, hold, supersede or require escalation for this exact action?
Explore →CAFIN Data Trust — What may this exact data, derivative or model be used for, where, by whom, for which purpose, and under which rights?
Explore →AssetZero — What is this exact asset, who controls it, what state is it in, and did custody or transfer actually become authoritative reality?
Explore →AgreementZero — What exactly was committed, by whom with authority, under which versioned terms, and has each obligation actually been performed or cured?
Explore →RiskZero — Given uncertainty, controls, blast radius and consequence limits, may this exact action proceed—and who owns that acceptance?
Explore →Composition law
All six pre-action pillars must admit before execution may become eligible; FINAL still requires post-action authoritative evidence. Any HOLD remains HOLD. Any governing contradiction can REOPEN the dependent chain.