Finality Type System
Typed non-final, final, contradiction, cure, reopen and supersession states.
UNIVERSAL OUTCOME INFRASTRUCTURE
Finality extends beyond agent success into causal, temporal, negative, multi-reality, physical, economic, legal and settlement-aware outcome assurance without changing FRP 2 or FSK 1.
Reference implementation
125 invention contracts are mechanism-level registry entries within the broader 183-layer Deep Stack architecture. The two counts measure different dimensions. External integrations remain unasserted unless separately evidenced.
New computing primitives
An action can execute without becoming final. Finality types and the Reality Commit Barrier keep those states separate.
Typed non-final, final, contradiction, cure, reopen and supersession states.
Mandate, purpose, consequence budget, Outcome Contract, evidence requirements, jurisdiction and REOPEN conditions travel with the action.
Required admissible evidence must arrive before the action can cross from execution into whole-outcome FINAL.
Unresolved executed consequence becomes an explicit operational quantity.
Long-running workflows inherit proof obligations rather than collapsing child completion into global FINAL.
Economic or physical consequence can STOP independently of generic authorization.
Deep outcome semantics
The architecture refuses to use one proof rule for fundamentally different forms of outcome truth.
State being true does not prove the authorized action caused it.
Explore →Absence claims require a defined universe, complete observation coverage and a closed time window.
Explore →Freshness, stability windows, expiry and delayed outcomes are explicit.
Child outcomes can compose only under a declared parent policy.
A favorable evidence subset cannot hide a required contradictory source.
Revoked authority, compromised keys or invalidated source assumptions reopen every dependent conclusion.
Reality domains
Outcome Contracts can require agreement across the reality domains that actually govern the obligation.
What admissible evidence reports.
What operating systems presently recognize.
What exists in the physical environment.
What economic obligations or value have changed.
What authorized legal or regulatory sources recognize.
Whether the configured combination of realities satisfies the Outcome Contract.
Civilization interfaces
Identity, attestation, provenance, transparency, digital twins and settlement systems are reference evidence layers. Finality determines what conclusion those inputs justify.
authorization decision evidence
tool and context execution evidence
agent coordination and task evidence
machine-verifiable credential and identity claims
legal entity, organizational role and authority identity
attestation evidence and verifier architecture
signed-statement transparency and receipts
content provenance and authenticity evidence
digital-twin reference architecture
Economic architecture
The reference economic ledger demonstrates that external consequential flows can exceed one global-scale dollars by orders of magnitude while making no claim that Finality currently assures or owns those flows.